0.04/0.14	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.14/0.15	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.14/0.36	% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
0.14/0.36	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.14/0.36	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.14/0.36	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.14/0.36	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.14/0.36	% CPULimit   : 960
0.14/0.36	% WCLimit    : 120
0.14/0.36	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 02:49:20 EDT 2022
0.14/0.36	% CPUTime    : 
0.22/0.51	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.22/0.51	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.22/0.51	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.22/0.53	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.22/0.53	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.22/0.53	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores
0.22/0.53	# Starting sh2lt with 120s (1) cores
0.22/0.53	# Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 120s (1) cores
0.22/0.53	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 120s (1) cores
0.22/0.53	# post_as_ho5 with pid 26601 completed with status 0
0.22/0.53	# Result found by post_as_ho5
0.22/0.53	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.22/0.53	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.22/0.53	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores
0.22/0.53	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
0.22/0.53	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/2
0.22/0.53	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF11-MHHFFMBN
0.22/0.53	# partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN
0.22/0.53	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
0.22/0.53	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 325s (1) cores
0.22/0.53	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 61s (1) cores
0.22/0.53	# Starting sh5l with 55s (1) cores
0.22/0.53	# Starting new_bool_3 with 55s (1) cores
0.22/0.53	# Starting new_bool_1 with 55s (1) cores
0.22/0.53	# post_as_ho5 with pid 26606 completed with status 0
0.22/0.53	# Result found by post_as_ho5
0.22/0.53	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
0.22/0.53	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.22/0.53	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores
0.22/0.53	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
0.22/0.53	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/2
0.22/0.53	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF11-MHHFFMBN
0.22/0.53	# partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN
0.22/0.53	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
0.22/0.53	# Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 325s (1) cores
0.22/0.53	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 61s (1) cores
0.22/0.53	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.22/0.53	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.22/0.53	
0.22/0.53	# Proof found!
0.22/0.53	# SZS status Theorem
0.22/0.53	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_22, type, esk1_0: a > a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_23, type, esk2_0: a > a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_24, type, esk3_0: a > a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_25, type, esk4_1: ((a > a) > $o) > a > a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_26, type, esk5_1: ((a > a) > $o) > a > a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_27, type, epred1_0: (a > a) > $o).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_28, type, esk6_0: a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_29, type, esk7_0: a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_30, type, esk8_1: (a > a) > a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_31, type, esk9_0: a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_32, type, esk10_0: a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_33, type, esk11_0: a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_34, type, esk12_0: a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_35, type, esk13_0: a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_36, type, esk14_0: a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_37, type, esk15_0: a).
0.22/0.53	thf(decl_38, type, esk16_0: a).
0.22/0.53	thf(cTHM135D_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > a, X2:a > a, X3:a > a]:(((![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((X4 @ X3)<=((X4 @ X1)&![X5:a > a]:(((X4 @ (^[X6:a]:(X1 @ (X5 @ X6))))<=(X4 @ X5))))))&![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((X4 @ X2)<=((X4 @ X1)&![X5:a > a]:(((X4 @ (^[X6:a]:(X1 @ (X5 @ X6))))<=(X4 @ X5)))))))=>![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((![X5:a > a]:(((X4 @ X5)=>(X4 @ (^[X6:a]:(X1 @ (X5 @ X6))))))&(X4 @ X1))=>(X4 @ (^[X6:a]:(X2 @ (X3 @ X6)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM135D_pme)).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > a, X2:a > a, X3:a > a]:(((![X4:(a > a) > $o]:((((X4 @ X1)&![X5:a > a]:(((X4 @ X5)=>(X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(X1 @ (X5 @ Z0)))))))=>(X4 @ X3)))&![X4:(a > a) > $o]:((((X4 @ X1)&![X5:a > a]:(((X4 @ X5)=>(X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(X1 @ (X5 @ Z0)))))))=>(X4 @ X2))))=>![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((![X5:a > a]:(((X4 @ X5)=>(X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(X1 @ (X5 @ Z0))))))&(X4 @ X1))=>(X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(X2 @ (X3 @ Z0))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM135D_pme])])])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X19:(a > a) > $o, X21:(a > a) > $o, X24:a > a]:((((((X19 @ (esk4_1 @ X19))|~(X19 @ esk1_0)|(X19 @ esk3_0))&(~(X19 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk4_1 @ X19 @ Z0))))|~(X19 @ esk1_0)|(X19 @ esk3_0)))&(((X21 @ (esk5_1 @ X21))|~(X21 @ esk1_0)|(X21 @ esk2_0))&(~(X21 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk5_1 @ X21 @ Z0))))|~(X21 @ esk1_0)|(X21 @ esk2_0))))&(((~(epred1_0 @ X24)|(epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (X24 @ Z0)))))&(epred1_0 @ esk1_0))&~(epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk2_0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((X4 @ (esk4_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk3_0)|~((X4 @ esk1_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk1_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a > a]:(((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (X1 @ Z0))))|~((epred1_0 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ (esk4_1 @ epred1_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((X4 @ esk3_0)|~((X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk4_1 @ X4 @ Z0)))))|~((X4 @ esk1_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk4_1 @ epred1_0 @ Z0))))|(epred1_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk3_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), c_0_4])])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((X4 @ (esk5_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk2_0)|~((X4 @ esk1_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_9])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk2_0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk5_1 @ (^[Z1:a > a]:((epred1_0 @ (^[Z2:a]:(Z1 @ (esk3_0 @ Z2)))))) @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_12])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((X4 @ esk2_0)|~((X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk5_1 @ X4 @ Z0)))))|~((X4 @ esk1_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk5_1 @ (^[Z1:a > a]:((epred1_0 @ (^[Z2:a]:(Z1 @ (esk3_0 @ Z2)))))) @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_13])).
0.22/0.53	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_11])]), c_0_12]), ['proof']).
0.22/0.53	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.22/0.53	# Parsed axioms                        : 2
0.22/0.53	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
0.22/0.53	# Initial clauses                      : 7
0.22/0.53	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.22/0.53	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
0.22/0.53	# Processed clauses                    : 68
0.22/0.53	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.22/0.53	# ...subsumed                          : 1
0.22/0.53	# ...remaining for further processing  : 66
0.22/0.53	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.22/0.53	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.22/0.53	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.22/0.53	# Backward-rewritten                   : 14
0.22/0.53	# Generated clauses                    : 125
0.22/0.53	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 94
0.22/0.53	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.22/0.53	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.22/0.53	# Paramodulations                      : 83
0.22/0.53	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.22/0.53	# NegExts                              : 11
0.22/0.53	# Equation resolutions                 : 4
0.22/0.53	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.22/0.53	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.22/0.53	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.22/0.53	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.22/0.53	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.22/0.53	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.22/0.53	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.22/0.53	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.22/0.53	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.22/0.53	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.22/0.53	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.22/0.53	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.22/0.53	# Current number of processed clauses  : 44
0.22/0.53	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 17
0.22/0.53	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.22/0.53	#    Negative unit clauses             : 5
0.22/0.53	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 22
0.22/0.53	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40
0.22/0.53	# ...number of literals in the above   : 78
0.22/0.53	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.22/0.53	# Current number of archived clauses   : 22
0.22/0.53	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 56
0.22/0.53	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 51
0.22/0.53	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.22/0.53	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
0.22/0.53	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.22/0.53	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 73
0.22/0.53	# BW rewrite match successes           : 2
0.22/0.53	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.22/0.53	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.22/0.53	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 10713
0.22/0.53	
0.22/0.53	# -------------------------------------------------
0.22/0.53	# User time                : 0.013 s
0.22/0.53	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.22/0.53	# Total time               : 0.016 s
0.22/0.53	# Maximum resident set size: 1884 pages
0.22/0.53	
0.22/0.53	# -------------------------------------------------
0.22/0.53	# User time                : 0.056 s
0.22/0.53	# System time              : 0.011 s
0.22/0.53	# Total time               : 0.066 s
0.22/0.53	# Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
0.22/0.53	EOF